Tuesday 26 March 2013

Online Safety, Legal Concerns and Ethical Practice for Learners


Students should be educated in safe, ethical and legal practices online, just as they are educated in safe, ethical and legal practices in the playground, or in society. The dangers learners face online are numerous and seem daunting because of the seemingly unknown aspect of the offender. Students need to be explicitly educated three main areas, listed in the table below. The education resources listed on the 3rd column are a series of links to excellent resources relating to each area of concern.

Area

Concerns

Educational Resources

Online Safety
Exposure to inappropriate materials – Pornographic, sexually explicit, offensive, hateful and violent content and illicit materials

Stranger danger – on social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Blogs and Wikis

Harassment and Bullying – a major concern in the last 5 years

Identity theft – hackers can steal unwary student’s information that is left lying around online

Child identity protection – student identity should never be revealed online.



Ethical Practice
Referencing – correct acknowledgement of information and quotes from other people.
Proper sourcing of information – Wikipedia is not an effective source, while Encyclopaedia Brittanica is a safer source of information.
Students need to have the tools to be able to make judgements about sources



Legal Ramifications
Copyright – it is so easy to copy information from various sources around the web and post them without regard for copyright law. Students need to be informed about the right and wrong regarding copyright. 10% rule for educational purposes.

Creative Commons – a place for free sourced materials without a copyright tag, rather a licence that allows them to be used freely.




Sunday 24 March 2013

Group 4 Tool - Soundation


With the advent of Java and other ‘Write Once, Run Anywhere’ (WORA) programming languages, the use of animations and simulations has become the most dynamic aspect of ICT’s, particularly on the internet. Web designers now implement WORA programming as a major feature of their websites. Browsers such as Chrome and Firefox use these syntaxes as an important part of their application systems, making their own application so diverse through the integration of web systems.

One of the many simulations that can be found on the web is called Soundation (www.soundation.com). The website acts as an online Digital Audio Workspace (DAW), a common tool used in the music industry for recording, mixing and mastering. Industry standard DAW’s include ProTools HD and Logic Pro, these programs cost in excess of $1000 with their associated hardware, whilst education standard DAW cost about $400 each, and most operating systems come with a audio recording program (e.g. Garage Band for Mac OSX) that can cover some basic features of DAW.

Soundation is a free online DAW that students can access anywhere, anytime for their own recording purposes. It is limited in function, but as a starting DAW, it is a very effective tool to teach beginning sound recording, mixing and mastering. From my own brief experience with Soundation, I have found it to be an easy tool to understand; very self-explanatory and I could easily see myself implementing this tool in my music classes. Students can create free accounts and save their work and then publish it to the web, embed it in their blogs or download completed tracks to mp3 format.

“For most music educators, performance is at the center of sharing music, and recording is most often a tool used primarily in an archival way” (Thibeault, 2012). I believe that recording should become the forefront of music sharing and music education in the 21st century, whilst paying respect to the important place music performance holds in the art form.

I believe that its accessibility along with its free sourcing make it a very flexible tool to use for my students, and they will become quite adept at using DAW’s at a beginner level, before moving to industry standard programs such as ProTools. Using Soundation, I created the following track using loops freely available from Soundation. It can be found here.



The following PMI analysis summarises my experience with Soundation as a web simulation tool.

Pluses
  • Free source
  • Similar design and layout to industry standard DAW
  • Ease of use
  • Free accounts allow students to save work
  • Online access for students anywhere, anytime
  • Cross OS compatibility, as it is a web app
  • Interactive and Engaging, students are directly responsible for the design and creation of the music.
  • Final tracks can be integrated anywhere on the web


Minuses
  • Online, can only be accessed there. Must have Internet access
  • Plagiarism – due to loops, only a certain number of ways things can be done.
  • Online safety can be an issue
  • Limited in its use, very basic


Interesting
  • Music recording is one of the most cross curriculum ways of intergrating assessment criteria in music
  • Once students master this DAW, they can progress to offline industry standard DAW like ProTools
  • Students can display their work online and get feedback via that channel of communication 


References

Thibeault, M. (2012). Wisdom for Music Education From the Recording Studio. General Music Today , 25 (2), 47-52.



Tuesday 19 March 2013

Group 3 Tools - PowerPoint Presentations and Prezi's


The use of visual presentations of content is not a new or revolutionary concept in schools. From the development of textbooks with information to the advent of the Overhead Projector (OHP) to the dawn of data projectors, presenting data to a classroom has become more and more simple with these ‘appliances,’ for want of a better word.

Of course, with data projectors, the ability to have information change automatically and digitally on command becomes the most important facet of the presentation design. I believe that some teachers can let it become the focus of learning design and once again, this is an example of Technology overshadowing the pedagogy and content parts of learning experience creation.

Of the tools we looked at in Group 3, PowerPoint appears to be the least interactive. It has been around since 1995 (18 years ago) and in that time has been misused, undervalued and abused. Typical slideshows are often very, very dull, have too much or too little text in them, or are packed full of static images that do little to engage or reinforce knowledge in students.

In the time that PowerPoint has been around, embedding has become a major part of the Internet, and indeed the whole computer experience. PowerPoint has also adapted as a program and is now able to be developed for students to interact with on both a classroom and individual level. There are now online tools that can embed PowerPoint files in online spaces.

There are options to integrate video, audio, Internet and basically anything you want (without letting the file get as big as a library.) It however, is still limited by its very straightforward layout and inability to focus on the big picture; rather the discrete slides are all that can be focussed on.

Whenever I have used PowerPoint, I have always used it as a forward-moving presentation and not worried about making it very interactive. I believe now that if I can make my PowerPoint’s more interactive and engaging, on both a classroom and individual level, I can achieve greater learning outcomes.

This is where Prezi’s supersede the traditional PowerPoint presentation. Prezi came about in late in the first decade of the 21st century and enable presenters to create highly engaging and interactive presentations using the power of flash. Herb (2013) suggests, “By staying current with new technology, more often than not your students will appreciate the change of pace from the tools they are seeing.” 

In my interactions with Prezi, I have found the interface for their creation to be highly enjoyable and functional, whilst giving me the flexibility to create practically anything I wanted. I had immense fun in creating the following Prezi. It doesn’t have all the bells and whistles but I learnt a vast array of techniques that I can use in the future on Prezi and I believe I will use the tool a lot!


The idea of the zooming in and out and creating the presentation on one page with ability to focus on different things is ingenious, and I believe gives presenters the opportunity to focus on the big picture and move in – this suit learners of a global approach but still has the functionality to support the opposite and let sequential learners sequence their learning.

PowerPoint presentations have many uses in a music classroom; here are some of the ideas I’ve come up with that are interactive and engaging:
  • Can be used to create Quizzes
  • An interlinked diagram with slides referring to the parts of the diagram clicked. Maybe a diagram of an instrument?
  • Well-designed ‘traditional style’ PowerPoint presentations are still effective if good design principles are followed. An excellent presentation on PowerPoint design can be found here.

Prezi is limited in options for use, but its main use is for interactive presentations online. Online multimedia can easily be added to it and its use of flash makes it ridiculously engaging. It should be noted that PowerPoint presentations can be imported to Prezi and made into exciting shows.

The following SWOT and PMI analyses are a summation of this reflection into presentations.

PowerPoint PMI

Plusses
  • As it is offline, can be used anywhere, anytime. (On a computer)
  • Lots of help available online and in hard copy. Books and classes are made specifically for PowerPoint.
  • Can be very interactive – this makes for good engagement (see minuses)
  • Can easily add multimedia
  • Very helpful for sequential learners in simple forms


Minuses
  • Can be extremely tedious to make interactive.
  • Very static without multimedia
  • Can become very big with multimedia and scores of slides
  • Detracts from a global view of a concept/idea/any knowledge, rather sequential


Interesting
  • Visual displays seem to help reinforce information. If students have individual copies of presentations chances are information may be retained.
  • Can be exported and become online Prezi’s
  • Many ways to use it – Individually as a presentation or as an interative activity, classroom presentation/activities


Prezi SWOT

Strengths
  • Engaging and interactive
  • Used correctly, is extremely aesthetically pleasing
  • Animation adds a lot of excitement
  • Easy and enjoyable to use, both for students and teachers


Weaknesses
  • As it is flash, can be very big in file size. This hampers loading time depending on bandwidth
  • Can only be used as a presentation, not very interactive in other ways other than presenting information.
  • Animation can become nauseous – going around and around in circles
  • Web based. Requires Internets!


Opportunities
  • Multimedia addition creates a whole new level of interaction and reinforces the point of information.
  • Students can have a very engaged learning experience creating their own Prezi. They will enjoy the technology and it can help reinforce content.


Threats
  • Copyright issues – as with all online tools.
  • Students using it to create a presentation may be overawed by the online software – TPCK Issue


References

Herb, J. (2013). Prezi – Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved from http://instructionaltechtalk.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-prezi/

Wednesday 13 March 2013

Group 2 Tools - Audio and Podcasting Reflection


The use of audio in my KLA (Arts/Music) is probably the most important multimedia tool that I will use in my education experiences. Not only is using audio engaging students without getting them to do a lot of work, just sit and listen, but they can relate to sound the easiest: it’s something we do from the very beginning of our cognitive development.

Fasso (2013) suggests that if we don’t focus on multimodal literacies in the 21st century, we are not catering for our students. Audio literacy forms part of that multimodal literacy and we must integrate it into our educational experiences. Thankfully, music is an auditory art form, tailor-made for the inclusion of audio ICT’s.

There are, of course, issues involved with using audio as a ICT tool. These are the same as the issues I mentioned in my post on images, with a lesser focus on the student privacy (can’t be seen in audio).

There are a lot of ways I can implement audio into my teaching. Here are a select few:
  • Using audio to provide examples of musical concepts in a blog (e.g. timbre of instruments).
  • Getting students to record themselves playing instruments, whether they use low level software (voice-record) or high end Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) software like ProTools or Logic Pro, and upload them to an online space.
  • Students recording themselves in performance and then critically reviewing their performance for improvement.
  • Uploading a series of recordings (with permission) for students to use in critical analysis assessment.

An activity we were assigned to do for this task was to upload an audio recording of our voice. As a music major, this was something that I’ve done a thousand times, and as I have original music recorded, I decided to upload that to my wiki page. You can find a copy of one of my original big band recordings here.

Further use of audio in ICT’s includes Podcasting. Podcasts, I believe, can be explained as sound file that is part of a large series, updated regularly through the internet – like an audio magazine subscription. There are an abundance of Podcasts on the internet, but a main source of them is at the Apple iTunes Store. Podcasts seem to have an unending number of topics, and there a lot of great educational podcasts that can benefit learners. I went searching through the iTunes Store, and came up with the following list for Music education:

Podcasts could be used to enrich learning as homework experiences or as main content in lesson structures. Depending on the quality of the podcasts, they are often updated regularly and are quite entertaining. Downsides include length – some are up to 45 minutes long of just audio. This isn’t very engaging. An activity we were given to do was make our own podcast. There are a lot of free tools to use on the Internet and we were suggested to use PodOMatic. This tool was very easy to use and quite fun in hindsight – I can easily see myself asking my students to create a podcast as a term long class activity. Here is an embedded player of my podcast I created.


Here is the link to my podcast website: http://rosscgdlt.podomatic.com/

The following SWOT Analysis summarises the various positives and negatives of using audio as a classroom tool.

Strengths

  • Numerous applications in music
  • Interactive and easily engaging without effort
  • Can explain a lot with audio (non language)
  • Podcasts contain a lot of excellent learning materials that are updated regularly
  • Easily scaffold-able
Weaknesses

  • Permissions, Liscencing and Safety
  • 45-minute podcasts of just talking can get very boring
Opportunities

  • Students can record music for assessment
  • Students can record performances for analysis
  • Students can make podcasts for term long projects (like an audio blog)
  • Audio Textbooks
Threats

  • Can be ineffective learning tools via lack of scaffold
  • May become detriment to content and ways of working (TPCK)

References

Fasso, W. (2013). Digital tool 5: podcasting. Retrieved from CQUniversity e-courses, EDED20491 ICT’s for Learning Design, http://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/page/view.php?id=115359